Data Dive - A breakdown of gas and LNG demand in Asia
IEEFA's interactive data tool providing detailed insights into natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand across 14 Asian economies.
About
This interactive data tool provides detailed insights into natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand across 14 Asian economies shown in the map below.
It relies primarily on official government sources — converted to equivalent units and standardized categorizations — to analyze sectoral gas consumption (Section 1) and natural gas production trends (Section 2), as well as LNG imports, annual LNG spending, and average import prices (Section 3).
Since natural gas is used as a fuel or a feedstock in various applications throughout Asia, understanding the sectoral drivers and barriers to demand growth can be complex. While not intended to provide a comprehensive demand forecast, this tool provides insights into near-term challenges that may affect natural gas and LNG growth in key sectors (Section 4). The final section (Section 5) discusses the potential impacts of lower LNG prices on demand.
Please see the downloadable file here for a detailed methodology, including expanded citations and references. The press release is available here.
Note: Using an updated internet browser will help to ensure all graphics on this page display correctly. For any issues, contact us.
Key findings
Content overview
Use the links below for quick navigation:
Section 1
Natural gas demand in Asia
Overall natural gas demand growth by country
Natural gas demand by sector
Natural gas demand growth by sector
Country-level natural gas consumption by sector
Section 2
Natural gas production in Asia
Domestic gas production in Asian countries
Proven natural gas reserves in select Asian Countries
Section 3
LNG imports in Asia
LNG imports by supply country
Value of LNG imports by country
Average LNG import costs in select markets
Cost of gas supplies in Thailand
Section 4
Risks to gas and LNG demand growth in Asia
Section 5
What if LNG prices fall?
The press release is available here.
Section 1: Natural gas demand in Asia
- Asia’s natural gas consumption increased 35% between 2015 and 2023. China accounted for over 90% of this increase, as gas demand in the country more than doubled over the period. Gas demand also increased by more than 30% in India, South Korea, and Taiwan.
- Total gas demand fell in five countries by a combined 31.3 billion cubic meters (bcm), with Japan accounting for 70% of the decline. This was enough to offset demand growth elsewhere in the region, excluding China and India.
The following two charts show natural gas demand by sector in each country surveyed. The first includes sectoral categorizations standardized by IEEFA, while the second shows more specific sectors reported by each country.
- The power sector is currently the region’s largest consumer of natural gas, but demand differs significantly among individual markets. Over 50% of gas demand is concentrated in the power sector in Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam and Bangladesh.
- On the other hand, China, India, Indonesia, and Malaysia report nearly 40% to 65% of their natural gas demand in the industrial sector, which includes manufacturing, refining, iron and steelmaking, cement production, mining, agriculture, and other subsectors. Bangladesh, Thailand, South Korea, Pakistan, Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan also report between 10%–30% of demand in the industrial sector.
- The use of natural gas in the residential and commercial sector (hereby referred to jointly as buildings) is limited to countries with expansive pipeline distribution networks, including China, Japan, South Korea, Pakistan, Hong Kong, and Bangladesh. Contrastingly, the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia lack the infrastructure for widespread household consumption, as gas grids have primarily been established for larger end-users. India has targets to significantly expand residential and commercial gas connections, though progress remains behind targets.
- The transport sector only accounts for a significant share of total gas demand in India and China. India primarily uses compressed natural gas (CNG) for three-wheelers, city buses, passenger cars and taxis, and light commercial vehicles. Meanwhile, China uses LNG in liquid form for heavy-duty trucking. CNG plays a minor but declining role in Thailand.
- In India, natural gas is primarily used in fertilizer production, transportation, and the manufacture of ceramics, glass, and other products. In China, natural gas is mainly consumed in residential heating and cooking, fertilizer production, and manufacturing. Claims that LNG can displace coal consumption in China and India downplay the fact that natural gas plays a minor role in power generation, where most coal usage occurs.
- Although the power sector is currently the largest end-user of gas in the region, the industrial sector has accounted for the largest volume of growth since 2015. This is largely attributable to China’s infrastructure and real estate expansion, increasing demand for materials production and export-driven manufacturing output. Similar drivers have boosted industrial gas demand in India, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Bangladesh.
- The fertilizer and petrochemical sectors have accounted for the second-largest increase in natural gas demand since 2015 among markets surveyed. China’s gas usage for chemicals increased 37 bcm between 2015 and 2023, while the next largest increase was in India, where demand in fertilizers/petrochemicals rose by 4 bcm between 2015 and 2024. Other countries, including South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, experienced smaller increases by volume.
- The buildings sector accounted for a large volume of growth over the period, though growth was almost entirely concentrated in China and, to a lesser extent, in South Korea and India. Declining demand in Japan’s buildings segment — due to demographic trends and energy efficiency gains — was enough to offset increases throughout the rest of Asia, excluding China.
- Gas demand in the power sector grew considerably in China, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Bangladesh, along with smaller increases in Thailand and Pakistan. Drivers include electricity demand growth, the commissioning of new gas-fired power plants, coal-to-gas switching policies in South Korea, and nuclear retirements in Taiwan, among many other factors.
- On the other hand, power sector gas demand shrank compared to 2015 levels in Japan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Japan’s demand has fallen steeply in line with nuclear restarts and renewables deployment. Declines in India, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Indonesia were due largely to uncompetitive prices, gas supply limitations, and/or government prioritization of non-power sectors for gas allocation.
- Gas demand growth in the transport sector has been driven almost entirely by China and India. Chinese gas use for transport grew by more than 50% between 2015 and 2023, and over sixfold in India from 2016 to 2025. Transport gas demand is lower compared to 2015 in Japan, Thailand, Pakistan, South Korea, and Malaysia.
- Notably, few government data sources distinguish between the end-use of domestically produced natural gas, pipeline gas imports, and imported LNG. However, India’s LNG demand growth has come almost entirely from fertilizers due to government subsidies that shield end-users from volatile fuel and production costs, while other segments have relied mainly on cheaper domestically produced gas.
Section 2: Natural gas production in Asia
- Domestic gas production is declining throughout Asia, with the notable exceptions of China and Malaysia. In India, production peaked in 2010, and despite an uptick in recent years, the outlook remains challenging. Declining gas production is widely cited as a major LNG demand driver, as countries aim to replace domestic output with seaborne imports. Depletion of natural gas reserves is imminent — less than 10 years at current production rates — in the Philippines, Thailand, and Bangladesh.
- Production declines throughout South and Southeast Asia are due to various factors, including maturing gas fields, expansion into more geologically challenging and expensive reserves, limited discoveries, pricing negotiations, geopolitical tensions, political instability, and notable withdrawals by global oil and gas majors.
By contrast, increasing domestic production in China is primarily due to concerted government policies prioritizing energy self-sufficiency and the development of unconventional gas resources. In 2024, China produced 246.4 bcm of gas, exceeding a 2030 target of 230 bcm six years ahead of schedule. Domestic production growth and pipeline imports from Russia and Central Asia have constrained China’s demand for more expensive LNG imports.
- Due to extreme volatility and high prices in global LNG markets, most countries in the region are exploring options to reinvigorate domestic production. Investment in upstream natural gas production in Southeast Asia is expected to increase from USD5 billion in 2021 to over USD30 billion in 2027, driven largely by offshore deepwater plays. While upstream projects in the region have historically required breakeven prices of below USD4 per million British thermal units (MMBtu), newer offshore projects may require prices between USD6–7.5/MMBtu, though reliance on carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) would likely add costs.
- Of the markets surveyed, China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Thailand import pipeline gas from neighboring countries. Malaysia and Indonesia export pipeline gas to Singapore, and China sends pipeline gas to Hong Kong. While China’s pipeline imports from Russia and Central Asia may dampen its future LNG requirements, Thailand’s LNG demand may rise if pipeline imports from Myanmar continue to fall. Pipeline exports from Indonesia and Malaysia are also expected to decline further, increasing pressure on Singapore’s LNG imports.
Section 3: LNG imports in Asia
- Between 2015 and 2024, Australia supplied the largest volume of LNG to the 13 countries included in this report, followed by Qatar, Malaysia, the United States (US), and Russia. Over this period, the share of Australian and US LNG in Asia has increased, while the share of Qatari LNG has fallen.
- These trends vary across Asia. Qatar remains the dominant supplier in South Asia due to geographic proximity and cheaper delivered costs, while the share of Qatari LNG has fallen in Northeast Asia from 26% to 13%. This is partly due to falling Japanese imports, which have dropped in line with lower gas demand and the expiry of several large, fixed destination contracts with Qatar.
- In 2025, the share of US LNG in the region is significantly lower than in previous years despite political pressure to import American products. China halted US LNG imports entirely in March 2025, and Chinese buyers are diverting shipments elsewhere. US LNG imports have also fallen across the region — including Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand — illustrating that prices remain the key driver of near-term LNG flows, not politics.
- Russia’s share of LNG in the region was 5% in 2024 and has remained flat since 2015. Declining Russian LNG imports in Japan and South Korea have been offset by higher purchases by China, where Russian LNG volumes have increased from 0.20 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) to 7.1 MTPA. In 2024, China was the largest buyer of Russian LNG, followed by France, Japan, Spain, and Belgium. Russian LNG supplies to South and Southeast Asia remain marginal.
- A country’s annual LNG import bill denominated in local currency will vary according to global market prices, demand, pricing benchmarks, foreign exchange rates, and other factors. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) surveyed customs data from 11 countries to assess annual LNG import costs. In 2023, the most recent year for which customs data was available in each market, these countries spent USD177.6 billion, down from USD224.2 billion in 2022 but nearly double the amount paid in 2015.
- Average import prices per million British thermal unit (MMBtu) are shown below for select countries, alongside the Japan-Korea Marker (JKM), a benchmark for Asian spot market prices.
- Average prices paid by importers can vary depending on exposure to various pricing benchmarks, contractual flexibilities, fuel switching ability, and many other factors. Due to rapid declines in domestic production and pipeline imports, Thailand paid an average price of USD25/MMBtu in 2022, over 2.5 times the country’s average LNG cost a year earlier.
- Conversely, in China, with lower gas demand due to strict COVID-19 containment policies and cheaper alternatives, buyers and traders could divert LNG cargoes to other regions. As a result of this flexibility, China was able to play the role of global balancer and pay among the lowest average LNG prices in Asia in 2022.
- In 2022, higher LNG prices pushed Japan’s fossil fuel import bill to its highest level, demonstrating that while the country’s LNG procurement strategy prioritizes long positions and supplier diversity, it cannot guarantee affordability.
- With domestic production declining across most countries, Asia is undergoing a transition from an energy system reliant on lower-cost, domestically produced gas to one dependent on more expensive LNG imports.
- Domestic gas production and pipeline trade tend to be cheaper than LNG due to liquefaction, transportation, and regasification costs. For example, Thailand’s average price of offshore gas production has remained slightly above USD5/MMBtu. In the Philippines, the oil-linked price of offshore gas from the Malampaya field has averaged USD8.78/MMBtu over its lifetime. Associated gas production in Vietnam is priced around USD1–1.25/MMBtu, while the cost of developing dry gas fields has been around USD5/MMBtu or more for proposed offshore projects. In Pakistan, the average wellhead price of domestic gas production is between USD3.50–4/MMBtu. Indonesian gas piped to Singapore and Malaysia has been priced at USD6/MMBtu. China’s domestic gas and pipeline imports are estimated to cost roughly USD5/MMBtu and USD8–9/MMBtu, respectively.
- By contrast, wholesale gas prices in highly LNG-dependent markets like Japan and South Korea are typically between USD11–15/MMBtu.
Section 4: Risks to gas and LNG demand growth in Asia
Although this data tool does not provide a detailed outlook for future gas and LNG demand in Asia, this section outlines some significant barriers to demand growth in key end-use sectors that may be overlooked in industry forecasts and media reports. It also discusses the potential impacts of falling LNG prices on regional LNG demand.
Power sector
As noted in Section 1, the power sector is Asia’s largest consumer of natural gas. Gas-fired electricity generation has increased compared to 2015 levels in numerous countries, except Japan, India, the Philippines, and Vietnam. The following chart shows electricity generation trends for select sources.
Looking ahead, Asian countries have varying approaches regarding the role of gas and LNG-fired power plants. Power development plans in Japan and South Korea — two of the world’s largest LNG importers — envision steep declines in the share of gas-fired power generation over the next decade. In China, gas plants largely serve peaking roles while the government prioritizes renewable energy and coal for energy security. India has no plans to build new gas-fired power plants, as many existing facilities remain stranded.
Much of the industry optimism for growth focuses on South and Southeast Asia. However, proposed projects have often faced extensive delays due to high and volatile fuel costs, contractual challenges, infrastructure limitations, a lack of standardized negotiating procedures, and unclear legal guidelines, among other issues.
In Vietnam, for example, government plans envision over 22 gigawatts (GW) of LNG-fired power plants by 2030. However, only one plant — set for commercial operations in 2025 — has finalized a power purchase agreement (PPA). Few other Vietnamese projects are expected to come online this decade. Similarly, in the Philippines, only one greenfield plant has secured an offtake contract, while renewables deployment is accelerating. Bangladesh’s state-owned oil and gas company does not expect any power sector gas demand growth through 2028, while Pakistan abandoned new LNG-fired power plants entirely in 2023 due to unaffordable prices.
As gas-related infrastructure projects face delays, renewables deployment and cross-border electricity trade could reduce long-term gas demand. In Vietnam, wind and solar generation have increased by nearly 600% since 2019, while gas generation has fallen by half. Since ceasing new LNG-fired power plants, Pakistan has installed roughly 34GW of solar capacity — primarily from cheap, imported Chinese panels — to become the world’s sixth largest solar market. In the Philippines, solar is now the fastest-growing asset class. Meanwhile, Thailand’s sizable imports of electricity continue to increase, driving new large-scale export projects in neighboring Laos. Policymakers in Vietnam have proposed a fivefold increase in electricity imports from Laos and China. Ultimately, bilateral electricity trade may suppress demand for other fuels, and recurring gas plant delays add impetus to pursue cheaper and faster options for meeting electricity demand growth.
Global natural gas turbine shortages could further increase lead times for new gas-to-power projects. The world’s largest turbine manufacturers are reporting large order backlogs and delivery timelines up to seven years, due largely to supply chain bottlenecks, labor shortages, and rising power demand from data centers in the US. These issues are inflating capital costs, which now range from USD2,200 to USD2,500 per kilowatt (kW), up from less than USD1,000/kW in 2022. For projects in Asia that have not yet secured turbine orders, backlogs and cost inflation may impact project development and medium-term gas demand trajectories.
Global power demand for data centers is widely expected to surge, primarily in China and the US, with relatively smaller but significant increases in North and Southeast Asia. However, investments in new gas-fired power capacity to meet rising demand are concentrated almost entirely in the US through 2035. In Asia, data center expansion may boost gas usage, but most demand growth is expected to be met by a combination of renewables, coal, nuclear, and batteries. Moreover, near-term growth may be limited by turbine supply bottlenecks, volatile imported fuel costs, power grid constraints, and corporate clean energy commitments, among other factors.
Industrial sector
Asia’s industrial sectors have accounted for the largest volume of gas demand growth since 2015. In the short term, however, uncertainties surrounding the impact of unilateral tariffs from the US and geopolitical tensions pose significant downside risks to export-oriented industries that have driven the region’s industrial growth. Over the longer term, industrial gas demand is likely to continue increasing, as economic output rises to support growing populations and higher demand for consumer products and materials necessary for infrastructure development.
However, with domestic gas production declining in many countries, introducing more expensive gas from harder-to-produce domestic resources or LNG imports could harm the competitiveness of local industries established on legacy, low-cost gas sources.
The experience of Europe illustrates these issues. Before the invasion of Ukraine, European industries relied primarily on stable, low-cost gas imports from Russia. In 2022, the rapid shift to higher-cost LNG to replace Russian supply resulted in a dramatic increase in gas and electricity prices, which are expected to remain elevated. Higher energy prices are exacerbating pre-existing concerns about the competitiveness of energy-intensive sectors like steel, fertilizers, petrochemicals, refining, cement, and aluminum.
In price-sensitive emerging Asian markets, the decline of lower-cost domestic gas production is already posing challenges for industries. For example, low-cost, subsidized natural gas has been central to Bangladesh’s economic growth since the 1970s. However, LNG imports have sharply increased subsidies and eroded currency reserves. Meanwhile, foreign lenders have called for subsidy reductions to alleviate public debt, escalating pressure on gas tariffs for various consumer classes. These factors threaten Bangladesh’s industrial growth, particularly in the textile and garment sectors.
Higher dollar-denominated commodity prices can drain foreign currency reserves, leading to currency devaluation and increasing fuel costs in local terms. In Pakistan, an inability to secure affordable LNG cargoes in 2022 resulted in fuel shortages and extended load-shedding events that curtailed industrial output. In 2023, a 20% devaluation of the Pakistani rupee compounded the impact of higher energy costs into an even steeper increase in local currency terms.
Higher energy costs are aggravating pressures in Thailand’s industrial sector, which has reportedly lost 5,000 factories since 2021 amid increasing competition from Chinese manufacturers. Power tariffs surged during the 2022 energy crisis and remain above 2021 levels. Recent plans to reduce power tariffs have proposed allocating cheaper domestic gas to electricity generators, while diverting LNG costs to industrial users, but industry organizations have warned that this would dramatically increase industrial gas costs and further erode the country’s economic competitiveness.
As noted, China’s industrial sector has driven much of Asia’s gas demand growth over the past decade. The country’s gas usage has been closely tied to its real estate and infrastructure expansion, so its ongoing real estate downturn, declining population, and pivot away from property-driven economic growth may affect natural gas demand. While total gas demand grew 10% annually between 2015 and 2022, most projections expect the growth rate to slow, peaking between 2035 and 2040. For example, the China National Petroleum Corporation has revised its forecasts downward and expects gas consumption to peak between 559 bcm and 606 bcm in 2040, an implied growth rate of 2%–3% per year. While higher export-driven manufacturing activity should continue to lift gas demand, political uncertainties surrounding tariff levels, trade restrictions, and global efforts to reshore industrial activity could also challenge growth.
Chemical and fertilizer sectors
The chemical and fertilizer sectors are often cited as drivers for natural gas demand in Asia, since gas serves both as a feedstock and an energy source in producing basic chemicals like propylene, ethylene, ammonia, and others. However, declining gas production in many Asian economies and technical and economic challenges of using LNG are shifting investment patterns toward regions with low-cost gas supplies.
Historically, oil-based naptha has been the dominant feedstock for Asia’s petrochemical sector rather than natural gas liquids (NGLs). Recently, though, numerous petrochemical producers in Asia are reconfiguring steam crackers to process NGLs like ethane to reduce costs. The applicability of LNG as an alternative feedstock is limited, since NGLs are largely removed during liquefaction. While certain producers in India have used Middle Eastern LNG with higher ethane content for feedstocks, they have largely shifted toward direct ethane imports. Since 2016, gas demand in India’s petrochemical sector has fallen sharply.
Feedstock shifts in Asia’s petrochemical industry reflect a broader market challenge: Global petrochemical oversupply has left regional producers at a competitive disadvantage with producers in the US, the Middle East, and China (where chemical production is predominantly coal- and naptha-based). While capacity is expected to grow in Asia through 2030, higher feedstock costs and falling market prices have squeezed margins, leading to lower utilization and economically driven shutdowns. In the last year alone, shutdowns have occurred in the Philippines, Vietnam, Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, and elsewhere.
The long-term structural decline of the petrochemical industry is particularly steep in certain European and Asian economies, due partly to their reliance on more expensive, imported feedstocks. While petrochemical producers are counting on a market rebound this decade, those reliant on imported fuels remain vulnerable to supply disruptions, higher production costs, and lower margins, which may ultimately hinder the growth of gas and LNG demand as both a fuel and a feedstock in Asia.
In the fertilizer sector, natural gas is currently the primary feedstock for producing ammonia, a critical input for nitrogen-based fertilizers and other industrial products. Over 70% of global ammonia production occurs through natural gas-based steam reforming. China is the world’s largest ammonia producer, accounting for nearly 30% of global output.
Gas-based ammonia production in Asia also faces challenges regarding the availability and affordability of feedstock supply. Investments in nitrogen-based fertilizer capacity are concentrated in regions with low-cost gas resources, primarily the US, Nigeria, Qatar, and Russia. Meanwhile, Asia is not expected to add large capacities of gas-based ammonia production (with or without carbon capture) through 2030. Instead, new ammonia production is expected to be almost entirely electrolysis-based, due partly to uncompetitive regional natural gas prices.
These trends are clear in India, which produces 8% of the global ammonia supply. Although the fertilizer sector has been a major driver of LNG demand over the past decade, many forecasts expect almost no gas demand growth in India’s fertilizer sector through 2030. Recent green ammonia tenders in India have yielded record-low prices near cost parity with grey ammonia.
Whereas LNG use in India’s fertilizer sector has relied heavily on government subsidies, the reduction of fertilizer subsidies to address public debt in Pakistan and Bangladesh presents challenges for industry growth. In Pakistan, subsidies for fertilizer producers have historically kept gas feedstock costs below USD2/MMBtu. Recent subsidy reductions have led to a threefold increase in feedstock gas prices for certain fertilizer producers, which have put upward pressure on the price of agricultural products.
China produces nearly 56 million tonnes of ammonia annually, predominantly from coal. While gas consumption in the sector is still relatively significant, the government has placed restrictions on new chemical production projects, including hydrogen and ammonia plants, that aim to use gas as a feedstock. Additionally, recent policy initiatives have targeted a longer-term shift to cleaner production. This shift has focused on “green” renewable hydrogen and ammonia rather than “blue” — produced from natural gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS) — due to limited domestic gas feedstocks and muted policy support for CCS. Of China’s 96 CCS demonstration projects, only one involves hydrogen production, and one involves blue ammonia production, while 9 million tonnes of renewable ammonia capacity are under development. Both China and India are expected to have some of the lowest green ammonia costs in the world by 2030.
Buildings sector
Over the last decade, gas consumption in the buildings sector has increased primarily in China, with smaller increases in South Korea and India. Looking ahead, Asian gas demand for this sector will continue to be determined by a few key players.
For example, supportive government policies in India have boosted gas use in buildings by 0.9 bcm since 2016. Residential connections remain well behind government targets for connecting new users. Moreover, businesses and small industries are highly price-sensitive, meaning demand growth may continue to depend on the priority allocation of cheaper domestic gas. India’s residential gas consumption has increased at a much slower rate than household connections since 2019.
Similarly, in Pakistan, the number of buildings consumers rose 13% this decade, but gas demand fell 10% from a peak in 2020 as higher tariffs and supply disruptions discouraged consumption. In Bangladesh, while the number of gas consumers increased by a quarter, supply disruptions and higher tariffs reduced demand by almost 30%.
In China, achieving air quality objectives and emerging energy security concerns with city gas adoption in certain regions are likely to slow coal-to-gas switching. Moreover, the government’s April 2025 heat pump action plan calls for heat pumps to replace residential gas water heaters and coal-fired boilers more generally, potentially slowing gas demand growth for buildings.
In Northeast Asia, Japan’s gas demand in buildings fell to its lowest level in three decades in 2023, while regulations mandate zero-energy performance for new buildings starting in 2030. Residential gas demand is up slightly in South Korea and Taiwan, but commercial gas use has been flat for at least a decade. With populations declining and expansive gas infrastructure already in place, there is little reason to expect significant growth in buildings demand.
In Southeast Asia, gas is expected to play little to no role in buildings through 2050.
Road and marine transportation sectors
Gas use in road transportation is predominantly concentrated in China and India. Forecasts expect transport to increase Asian gas and LNG demand. However, the higher cost of LNG and the emergence of cost-competitive electric alternatives will challenge the role of gas in the transport sector.
China’s transport sector gas demand grew 85% between 2015 and 2023. While near-term growth will likely continue, LNG price volatility and increasingly competitive electric alternatives could limit its upside. As of June 2025, battery-electric heavy trucks have begun to outsell LNG counterparts, a trend that may be accelerated by nascent battery swapping technology. China’s LNG trucking boom is expected to slow through 2030.
Transport gas use has risen sixfold in India due to the expansion of infrastructure and CNG refueling stations, as well as the allocation of domestic gas for vehicles. Further progress on the government’s CNG refueling station target and a mandate to replace a third of the heavy truck vehicle stock with LNG-fueled vehicles could increase demand further. However, little progress has been made on LNG-fueled vehicles. Moreover, falling electric vehicle (EV) costs and rising gas and LNG costs could deter buyers from purchasing both LNG and CNG vehicles in the future.
LNG is emerging as an alternative fuel for marine vessels aiming to comply with international sulfur content regulations. While most ships purchase very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) to meet new standards, high costs are prompting marine fleet owners to consider LNG-fired vessels. In 2024, 642 LNG-fueled ships were operational, with another 631 on order for delivery by 2033.
Although LNG only accounted for 0.9% of bunker tonnage sold in the first half of 2025, global LNG bunker consumption reportedly grew 500% between 2020 and 2024. Shell expects LNG bunkering demand to quadruple to 16 MTPA by 2030.
Other marine fuels are also emerging, including liquid biomethane and bio-oil fuel blends. Methanol use remains limited compared to LNG, but as of December 2024, 216 methanol ships are on order, compared to 22 in operation. Electricity could play a larger role, particularly through the electrification of in-port operations. Battery-electric ships will likely require further cost reductions and infrastructure solutions to eliminate range and recharging concerns. The emissions intensity limit in the International Maritime Organization’s draft net-zero framework could accelerate orders of all alternative fuels, including LNG, if finalized. However, adoption delays are creating uncertainty about the benefit of investing in these technologies.
The buildout of LNG bunkering vessels to refuel ships through ship-to-ship transfers is significantly lagging the deployment of LNG-fueled vessels, which may also limit LNG bunkering growth over the next decade. Moreover, dual-fuel capabilities could see operators switch to oil-based fuels depending on operational, market, and regulatory conditions, impeding LNG bunkering activity.
Section 5: What if LNG prices fall?
Based on projects already under construction, global LNG export capacity is expected to grow by 193 MTPA between 2025 and 2028, a 40% increase. The rapid supply growth is likely to put downward pressure on global prices later this decade, though some forecasts suggest market tightness could resume as early as 2031.
Falling prices will likely boost short-term LNG demand in Asia, particularly among price-sensitive end-users in emerging markets. For example, industrial users in India have demonstrated elastic demand, switching to oil-based fuels and natural gas liquids when LNG prices rise. Similarly, Chinese buyers may sell flexible cargoes into the domestic market rather than pursue arbitrage opportunities elsewhere. LNG could become more competitive with oil-based fuels in both marine and road transport. LNG truck sales in China are highly sensitive to LNG and diesel prices.
However, lower LNG prices may not alleviate several long-term, structural barriers to rapid demand growth.
First, demand in Japan and South Korea’s mature markets is set to fall in line with long-term energy and climate plans. Demand in these wealthier Asian markets, including Taiwan and Singapore, is highly inelastic, so lower prices may not elicit a demand response.
Second, most LNG producers face breakeven liquefaction and delivery costs that may remain uncompetitive with alternative resources in importing markets. For example, LNG production and shipment from the US to Asia is widely estimated to cost between USD8–11/MMBtu (though this is rising, as discussed below). While market prices may temporarily fall below this level due to oversupply, breakeven production costs should serve as a long-term anchor for prices, ensuring producers can recover operational and investment costs. However, emerging Asian economies would likely need prices between USD3–5/MMBtu for LNG to be competitive with renewables and coal.
Third, lower LNG prices would likely remain higher than the historical costs of domestically produced gas in many Asian economies. Consequently, end-users may still face higher fuel costs due to the shift from domestic to imported gas. For export-oriented industries in the region — many of which were established on domestic gas costs below USD5/MMBtu — this change may continue to undermine regional competitiveness compared to markets with lower-cost, localized energy inputs. Falling LNG prices may temporarily assuage these concerns, but do not eliminate long-term investment risks associated with high imported fuel costs, energy supply chain vulnerability, and extreme volatility inherent to LNG markets.
Fourth, LNG demand growth faces mounting barriers in Asia’s power sector, historically the largest gas consumer in the region. Extensive delays for gas and LNG-related infrastructure, exacerbated by global gas turbine shortages, present a structural limitation on importers’ ability to respond to lower prices. Meanwhile, the deployment of low-cost renewables is undercutting the need for large LNG volumes and pushing gas-fired power plants into mid-merit and peaking roles.
More flexible operations complicate gas generation and fuel requirements, making it challenging to commit to long-term take-or-pay contracts that have historically underpinned financing for LNG supply chain investments. Global gas turbine shortages will exacerbate gas-to-power project delays, creating more renewables growth opportunities and hindering LNG requirements. Pakistan, for example, is now experiencing a domestic glut of gas supplies and looking to sell excess LNG, as renewables growth has reduced the need for gas-fired generation. In China’s Guangdong province, which hosts over a third of the country’s gas capacity, a recent overhaul in the payment scheme for gas plants may reduce utilization hours to accommodate higher renewables output.
Finally, the ability to take advantage of lower prices will depend on each buyer’s exposure to various pricing benchmarks. Oversupplied spot markets may benefit importers with fewer long-term offtake commitments. Buyers with traditional oil-indexed contracts may benefit from falling oil prices through 2026, though long-term forecasts anticipate rising crude prices over the longer term. On the other hand, US buyers with Henry Hub-linked contracts could see higher prices in the coming years. Many expect Henry Hub prices to continue increasing amid higher US gas demand and relatively flat production, while liquefaction fees from US export facilities are rising in accordance with material and labor costs. Therefore, buyers currently negotiating LNG deals with US suppliers risk locking in higher prices even as markets tilt into oversupply.
Read the press release: IEEFA’s new Data Dive reveals the drivers, barriers, and costs of Asia’s gas and LNG demand
Media Enquiries: Josielyn Manuel
[email protected]
About IEEFA: The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) examines issues related to energy markets, trends, and policies. The Institute's mission is to accelerate the transition to a diverse, sustainable and profitable energy economy. (ieefa.org)




