Some steelmakers are investigating and planning new technology combinations to enable the use of lower-grade iron ore in DRI processes.
The ability of DRI to use green hydrogen as a reducing agent, rather than metallurgical coal, means that investment in DRI is expected to expand significantly going forward.
Any significant global switch from blast furnaces to DRI processes will impact metallurgical coal demand.
Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) ironmaking processes are regarded as a key part of steelmaking’s lower-emissions future. The ability of DRI to use green hydrogen as a reducing agent, rather than metallurgical coal, means that investment in DRI is expected to expand significantly going forward.
DRI-electric arc furnace (EAF) technology is proven and in use today. However, it requires high-quality iron ore (DR-grade) with iron (Fe) content of 67% and above, which has lower levels of impurities. DR-grade iron ore currently makes up only about 4% of global iron ore supply. Some fossil fuel-based steelmaking supply chain incumbents suggest this scarcity means that there are limits on how much steelmaking can switch to lower-emissions DRI-based technology.
Some steelmakers are investigating and planning new technology combinations to enable the use of lower-grade iron ore in DRI processes.
BHP – one of the key suppliers of blast furnace-grade iron ore and metallurgical coal to the steel industry – has stated: “There is simply not enough high-quality iron ore suitable for efficient DRI/EAF production to meet the global steel demand.” BHP considers that most of the world’s steel will still be produced via the blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route in 2050.
However, some steelmakers are investigating and planning new technology combinations to enable the use of lower-grade iron ore in DRI processes, potentially alleviating the DR-grade iron ore scarcity problem and aiding the expansion of low-emissions steelmaking technology that does not use metallurgical coal.
A melting stage can be added to melt the DRI before being charged in a BOF instead of an EAF to produce high-quality steel. Some steel producers are investigating and developing installations along these lines:
Apart from the DRI-Melter-BOF routes, various companies are developing fluidised bed reduction processes that can reduce iron ore using hydrogen rather than via fossil fuels. An advantage of such processes is their ability to use iron ore fines, eliminating the cost and energy used in iron ore pelletisation or agglomeration. These technologies could help resolve the issue of limited global pelletising capacity for producing DR-grade iron ore pellets. In addition, there is the potential for these technologies to use blast furnace-grade ores.
These alternative steel technology routes could reduce the pressure of supplying DR-grade ores, shifting part of the DRI iron ore demand toward BF-grade pellets and fines. However, demand will continue to rise for DR-grade iron ore for an increasing number of DRI-EAF steelmaking operations and there still will be the need to improve the quality of iron ore via beneficiation, as well as for further magnetite mining project development (which can add to DR-grade ore supply) along with greater pelletising capacity.
Any significant global switch from blast furnaces to DRI processes will impact metallurgical coal demand.
However, the technology developments outlined in this report are starting to challenge the idea among some steel and iron ore market incumbents that a lack of DR-grade ore will limit any significant switch from blast furnaces to DRI processes.
Major iron ore miners should start to reassess their long-term strategies and prepare to supply more of their products to DRI-based steelmaking processes. Any significant global switch from blast furnaces to DRI processes will impact metallurgical coal demand. With new technology configurations set to allow more switching from blast furnaces to DRI in the longer term, miners can also bolster their Scope 3 emissions reduction ambitions.