Skip to main content

Commentary: Time for utility companies to reinvest in Arizona’s coalfield communities

April 30, 2020
Amanda Ormond and Karl Cates

Arizona is losing its coal industry faster than anyone ever expected, and the state’s power generation sector can and should be reinvesting heavily now in the towns, counties and communities hit hard by this sudden turn.

A report we published in February shows what’s happening in the industry across greater Arizona, where electricity generation is moving rapidly away from its historical roots in coal-fired power toward newer, cheaper, cleaner forms of production.

That was before COVID-19 arrived. The case for reinvestment is only made more urgent now by the coronavirus pandemic.


Local economic disarray looms in a way that could affect Arizona’s overall financial health


Coal plants have driven the growth of Arizona since the 1960s, electrifying cities, suburbs and small-town Arizona. Now, as the industry falls away, local economic disarray looms in a way that could affect the state’s overall financial health.

Navajo Generating Station — once the biggest coal-fired plant west of the Mississippi — closed last November; closure of Cholla Generating Station is imminent and Arizona’s three other coal-fired plants — Apache, Coronado and Springerville Generating Stations — are struggling to compete with gas-fired and renewable forms of generation.

NOTHING ABOUT THE ISSUE IS PARTISAN. Communities of all political affiliations and stripes are affected. Nor is environmental regulation driving change in electricity generation, which comes instead from market forces that favor modernization. The shift isn’t just regional, either. Coal-fired power is disappearing nationally — and in fact, utility companies nationwide should be reinvesting along the model we propose.

Arizona communities in the line of fire are concentrated in four counties: Apache, Cochise, Coconino and Navajo. And, while the coal industry collapse is hardly just a tribal problem, it is important to note that Hopi and Navajo communities are bearing much of the brunt of job losses and tax base erosion. Arizona utility companies hold a substantial stake in coal-fired assets in northwestern New Mexico, as part of the greater Arizona energy economy.

All of the places most immediately affected are ripe for utility company reinvestment now. All still have skilled work forces and plentiful transmission infrastructure. All have abundant land, sunshine, or wind, making them potential regional clean energy powerhouses.

Yet Arizona’s big three utility companies — Arizona Public Service Company (APS), Salt River Project (SRP) and Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) — have done little in terms of coalfield reinvestment, even though detailed proposals have been put forth and major initiatives have been under way for years elsewhere, most notably in Colorado, Washington and Germany.


One model has utilities committing $100,000 to affected communities for every megawatt of coal-fired generation


One model put forth by Jonathan Nez, the president of Navajo Nation, in a move affirmed by Timothy Nuvangyaoma, chairman of The Hopi Tribe in a TEP rate case, has the utility, as an initial reinvestment in the coalfield communities it has depended on for so long, committing $100,000 for every megawatt of coal-fired generation it owns in the Four Corners area. That would come to $61.2 million for the Navajo Nation and $16.8 million for the Hopi Tribe, divided evenly between TEP shareholders and ratepayers, a small opening price to pay for supporting economic transition in areas that have for so long powered so much of the rest of Arizona. The Nez formula ought to be applied across the board, as we proposed in a research brief we published in March.

TEP can and should embrace this proposal, and SRP and APS can and should follow suit by dedicating similar amounts of capital, proportionately speaking, that will serve not just as local stimulus but as a barrier against economic erosion that stands to affect the entire state. The return on utility company reinvestment initiatives will accrue to anyone with a rooting interest in the wider Arizona economy.

THAT SAID, UTILITY COMPANIES MOVE SLOWLY, AND SOMETIMES NOT AT ALL, unless prodded emphatically and publicly to do so. Luckily for Arizona, the state has three mechanisms at its disposal through which it can drive utility company reinvestment in coalfield communities:

  • Rate case initiatives or rule-making by the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC), which regulate APS and TEP in the public interest;
  • Unilateral action by SRP, which is run by a board accountable to its customers and to the greater good of Arizona;
  • Legislative action that would direct any or all of these utilities to set aside money for reinvestment or that would mandate a ballot initiative on this issue.

Use of any of these tools — or any in combination — would advance utility company reinvestment where opportunity exists now.

If, on the other hand, reinvestment doesn’t happen on a momentous scale, the cost of public services in these areas will accrue to the state and the overarching result will be a needless delay in the buildout of a competitive, geographically diverse and modern power-generation industry in Arizona.

While the pace and impact of the coal industry collapse has been all but certain for some time and is very likely being accelerated by the Coronavirus pandemic, discussion and decision-making on utility company reinvestment is only just beginning. It is time to pick up the pace.  


Amanda Ormond is the former director of the Arizona Energy Office and principal of the Ormond Group. Karl Cates ([email protected]) is an IEEFA policy analyst.

This op-ed first appeared in The Hill on April 29, 2020: Pandemic highlights opportunity for timely utility company reinvestment in Arizona’s coalfield communities

Related items

IEEFA report: The case for utility-company reinvestment in Arizona’s coalfield communities

IEEFA U.S: An ‘elegant, simple, and fair’ coalfield reinvestment formula for greater Arizona

IEEFA U.S.: Bill to incentivize federal reinvestment in tribal regions of Arizona suggests a model 


Amanda Ormond

Amanda Ormond is the former director of the Arizona Energy Office and principal of the Ormond Group.

Go to Profile

Karl Cates

Former IEEFA Transition Policy Analyst Karl Cates has been an editor for Bloomberg LP, an editor for the New York Times, and a consultant to the Treasury Department-sanctioned community development financial institution (CDFI) industry.

Go to Profile

Join our newsletter

Keep up to date with all the latest from IEEFA