Skip to main content

IEEFA U.S.: Dallas Federal Reserve Bank finds inflation hitting oil and gas producers

January 24, 2022
Trey Cowan and Clark Williams-Derry

Four times a year, the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank polls oil and gas executives in New Mexico, Louisiana, and Texas to gauge trends in the region’s energy sector. The lessons from its December 2021 Energy Survey are clear: Although oil and gas production is poised to grow this year, the industry faces mounting inflation challenges. 

The Dallas Fed reports that its input cost index—all costs involved in producing goods and services by oil and gas support service firms, based—rose to a five-year high of almost 70 during the last quarter of 2021, with about 72 percent of companies reporting increased costs and only 2 percent reporting a decline in costs. (The index represents the difference between the percentage of respondents expecting an increase and the percentage anticipating a decrease). 

Similarly, the finding and development costs index and the lease operating expenses index both registered the highest readings on record.  Survey responses suggested that input costs could rise by 10 percent, with almost two-thirds of the sample anticipating even greater cost increases. 

The inflation comes on top of rising costs caused by the exhaustion of the inventory of drilled-but-uncompleted (DUC) wells that will force the industry to ramp up drilling over the coming year just to keep output steady. IEEFA has already estimated that total spending on drilling could rise by 8 percent year-over-year, due solely to the exhaustion of DUCs. Add rapid cost inflation into the mix, and capital spending could rise by almost 20 percent just to maintain production at the same level as last year.

These cost increases will land first on oilfield service firms—who may not be able to pass the costs on to producers. One survey respondent from the oilfield service sector said the company was still “fighting to get back to acceptable margins for our products and services.” The response suggests that slack demand for drilling and completion, as well as the slow recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, has reduced the bargaining power of service providers—meaning they could bear a disproportionate share of the cost increases.

Capital spending could rise by almost 20 percent just to maintain production at the same level as last year

Even with these rising costs, about half of oil and gas production executives say they’ll boost output this year. But growth will be uneven: Small producers (fewer than 10,000 barrels per day) were more likely to seek production growth in 2022, while only about a quarter of the large producers singled out production growth as their primary goal. Among larger operators, debt reduction was more popular than production growth. The responses suggest that capital discipline has embedded itself more deeply in the minds of executives at larger companies.

Between rising costs and growing production, capital spending is primed to rise this year. All told, almost four out of five oil and gas production executives surveyed expect capital spending to increase above 2021 levels. Support services executives were almost as bullish, with 72 percent of the 42 firms expecting capital spending increases this year.

The survey gives hints about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trends as well—and, as with production, it reveals big differences between small and large operators. About 48 percent of executives from large firms said they planned to reduce GHG emissions by more than 5 percent by 2025, compared with only 24 percent for small firms. The responses represented an increase from 2021. Even so, pessimism about greenhouse gas targets abound. An overwhelming 95 percent of oil and gas executives said they doubt countries will be able to meet 2030 commitments for reducing GHG emissions.

The results expose a cognitive dissonance: Many oil and gas executives say that they aim to reduce their own emissions, but almost all of them believe countries will miss their targets. Perhaps this makes sense, given that so many oil and gas executives, especially at small firms, plan to boost drilling this year even as costs are spiking. 

Trey Cowan ([email protected]) is an IEEFA oil and gas analyst

Clark Williams-Derry ([email protected]) is an IEEFA energy finance analyst

Related items:

IEEFA. Frackers gained in 2021 as sweet spot of rising oil prices and lower costs boosted profits

IEEFA. Independent Producers Dominate Majors in the Permian

IEEFA. Wild price swings fail to satisfy either oil and gas industry or consumers

IEEFA. Short-term oil and gas gains likely to be replaced by long-term productivity pain

IEEFA. The Goldilocks predicament: For oil and gas, there are no “just right” prices

Trey Cowan

Trey Cowan is an oil & gas analyst focused on U.S. upstream and global energy markets with a keen interest in Texas activities. At IEEFA, Trey contributes research, commentary, and independent analysis assessing the energy industry’s transition to cleaner, more affordable and sustainable solutions.

Go to Profile

Clark Williams-Derry

Clark Williams-Derry focuses on the finances North America’s oil, gas, and coal industries. His areas of expertise include: the long-term financial performance of North American oil & gas companies, particularly fracking-focused enterprises; company- and basin-specific studies of oil and gas production; U.S. LNG exports in the context of global markets; and U.S. and Canadian coal export projects.

Go to Profile

Join our newsletter

Keep up to date with all the latest from IEEFA