Skip to main content


August 24, 2015

ALBANY, Aug. 24, 2015 ( — The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis today released a research report that finds that a proposal to repower the Cayuga coal-fired electricity power plant as a natural-gas-fired plant is economically unviable and would create a long-term drain on ratepayers.

Losing Proposition_ Why the Proposal to Repower the Cayuga Plant Should Be Rejected_IEEFA_Aug 2015

Click photo for full report

Cayuga Operating Company, a subsidiary of Upstate New York Power Producers, owns the 60-year-old plant, which is just north of Ithaca in Lansing, N.Y. The company is seeking approval from the New York Public Service Commission for its plan to repower the plant under a 10-year ratepayer-subsidized scheme that would begin in 2017.
The report, “A Losing Proposition: Why the Proposal to Repower the Cayuga Plant Should be Rejected,” includes three core findings:

  • A repowered Cayuga plant would require ongoing ratepayer-supplied subsidies totaling more than $265 million over the 10-year period of the proposal and could require further subsidies beyond 2027
  • The repowering project would not help the state in its effort to improve grid reliability.
  • There are less expensive and far better ways to achieve electric grid reliability and to maintain the local tax base and jobs and to promote economic development.

David Schlissel, IEEFA’s director of resource planning and the report’s lead author, said the repowering proposal is part of a larger pattern of public subsidies for failing coal-fired power plants. “The bailouts are costing taxpayers a lot more than is necessary,” Schlissel said. “With the increased affordability of renewable energy and an option for transmission system upgrades, there are other, stronger alternatives to bailing out old, uneconomical coal plants like Cayuga.”

The report notes that the plant’s closure would create a fiscal challenge for the Lansing school district, Tompkins County, the Town of Lansing and two service districts amounting to an annual loss of $1.8 million. Tom Sanzillo— IEEFA’s finance director, a co-author on the report, and a former deputy comptroller for New York State — said the state has investment mechanisms and resources in place already to fill the void. “The costs involved with these changes can be borne by local governments, but that approach would be unnecessarily narrow and burdensome,” Sanzillo said. “This report shows that ample state resources exist to help the community and workers weather the transition, and points out that the New York Power Authority (NYPA) has both the financial and energy planning resources to spearhead redevelopment.”

The IEEFA report is being filed today with the New York Public Service Commission by the Sierra Club as part of the public comment period on the proposed Cayuga Repowering Plan, Case No. 12-E-0577.

Media Contact: Karl Cates [email protected] 917-439-8225

About IEEFA — The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) conducts research and analyses on financial and economic issues related to energy and the environment. The Institute s mission is to accelerate the transition to a diverse, sustainable and profitable energy economy and to reduce.



Go to Profile

David Schlissel

David Schlissel is an IEEFA analyst with 50 years of experience as an economic and technical consultant on energy and environmental issues. 

Go to Profile

Cathy Kunkel

Cathy Kunkel is an Energy Consultant at IEEFA.

Go to Profile

Tom Sanzillo

Tom Sanzillo is Director of Financial Analysis for IEEFA. He has produced influential studies on the oil, gas, petrochemical and coal sectors in the U.S. and internationally, including company and credit analyses, facility development, oil and gas reserves, stock and commodity market analysis, and public and private financial structures.

Go to Profile

Join our newsletter

Keep up to date with all the latest from IEEFA